Unlike me, Martin Paredes hits you up for money.
But I am the one who is bought and paid for or something like that.
If that's the case, I guess Martin is still trying to say that he is for sale. What does that say if a piece of real estate stays on the market way too long? The real estate sucks.
With that said, if I go to Martin's website and drop $100.00, does he become my bi*tch?
He should, right? At least in his view everything is quid pro quo*.
But we all know Martin would do the right thing and refund my money.
Yeah right, and monkeys might fly out of my butt.
How do you think Martin Paredes' got that "opinion" from FORMER Judge Richard Roman? I am sure Roman charged Paredes for that, if not, then Roman is fool (which can be the case).
This explains why David K's attorney friends are indeed anonymous. The crime, figuratively speaking, is not that they do not know want to be known, why indeed they do, the crime they do not want to commit is that of being a publicly-known attorney dishing out free opinions. That attorney's existing clients would be like, "Hold up, you talked to some blogger about a legal case and you did not charge him, but you wanted a retainer before you could even talk to me?"
So there you have it, Martin Paredes is the blogger that is not for sale, except when he isn't, which is all the time, and he is getting legal opinion pieces from attorneys for "free".
*Martin will need to consult with Roman about what quid pro quo is, but won't be able to until I donate some money to his blog via PayPal.